ESSAY QUESTION (one hour)
    
    Floyd Moran is a self-made millionaire who founded the Mor-Mart discount department stores.  His wife, Emma Mae, had one daughter, Southern Belle, from a previous marriage. Floyd had no children of his own.  Floyd supported Southern Belle, but he never adopted her.  After 30 years of marriage, Emma Mae died.  She left her entire estate to Southern Belle.  By this time, Southern Belle had finished college and was a successful computer programmer.  About once a year she would visit Floyd.

    Floyd's only will up to this point was a form will that he had gotten at a stationery store shortly after getting married.  At the top it stated "LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF Floyd Moran"  (underlined words were written in ink in Floyd's handwriting; the rest of the will was part of the typeset form).  Further down, the form stated "I DISTRIBUTE MY ESTATE AS FOLLOWS" and Floyd wrote: "$10 goes to cousin Elmer, my only living relative, so he knows I did not forget him.  All the rest of my possessions, real and personal, go to my wife, Emma Mae, and her daughter, Southern Belle."  Floyd dated (May 3, 1970) and signed the form.  He then told his secretary: "Look, honey, this here's my will and it needs to be signed by two people on them dotted lines.  Take care of it."  The secretary left Floyd's office and took the form to the delivery boy's cubicle, told him it was Floyd's will, and they then both signed and dated it.

    Fast forward to 2000.  Emma Mae has died.  Floyd, who was now in his 70s, very lonely, and in failing health, decided to sell his company to its largest competitor.  He was assisted in this endeavor by the merger and acquisitions lawyers of the firm of Smith, Cohen, Kim & Lopez.  Floyd eventually sold his company for $60 million.  During the negotiations, he interacted extensively with Candy Babinsky, a young associate at the Smith firm.  Their friendship blossomed, and before long, Candy moved into Floyd's mansion.  They did not marry, however.  Opinions on the relationship were decidedly mixed.  Floyd told people that "Candy's the best darn thing that ever happened to me," while Southern Belle referred to her as "that gold-digging shyster."

    Shortly after the one-year anniversary of their relationship, Floyd died.  Soon thereafter, Candy offered a will for probate.  It appeared (i.e., you should accept as proven) that Floyd tore up his first will, i.e., the form will discussed above--after Candy moved in with him.  He then had Candy draft a second will (the one she offered for probate), which appointed her to be the executor and gave Floyd's entire estate to her.  The will explained that Floyd left nothing to Southern Belle because she was not his real daughter and had largely ignored him after her mother died.  It also appeared that Mr. Lopez, a probate partner at the Smith firm, had reviewed the will and found it satisfactory, although he did not talk to Floyd at that time.  When Floyd later came into the office to sign it, Lopez took him and Candy aside and asked Floyd if this new will was what Floyd wanted; Floyd nodded affirmatively.  The will was then properly attested, and there is no doubt that Floyd had mental capacity when he executed it.

    The governing law is that of the State of Loyola, which has adopted the rules and principles that we discussed in class. 

    Please answer the following questions:

    1.    Should the second will (the one Candy offered for probate) be probated?  Please concentrate on whether the second will is legally valid, rather than on possible ethical or disciplinary issues [about 40%].
    2.    If the second will is not probated, was the first one validly executed? [about 40%]
    3.    Assuming the first will was validly executed, and the second will is invalid, should the first will be probated?  [about 20%]

    Do NOT discuss the details of intestacy in case you decide that both wills are invalid (you can simply state that the estate will be distributed in accordance with the rules of intestate succession).  If it matters, the jurisdiction has abolished the common-law no residue of a residue rule.